Influence of maxillary posterior discrepancy on upper molar vertical position and facial vertical dimensions in subjects with or without skeletal open bite

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSignn L.E.A.-G.D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorAliaga-Del Castillo, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSignrez-Vargas L.F.P.C.D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFlores-Mir, C.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned6/22/2022 13:33
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T16:31:41Z
dc.date.available6/22/2022 13:33
dc.date.available2022-09-30T16:31:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractSummary Objectives: To determine the influence of maxillary posterior discrepancy on upper molar vertical position and dentofacial vertical dimensions in individuals with or without skeletal open bite (SOB). Materials and methods: Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 139 young adults were examined. The sample was divided into eight groups categorized according to their sagittal and vertical skeletal facial growth pattern and maxillary posterior discrepancy (present or absent). Upper molar vertical position, overbite, lower anterior facial height and facial height ratio were measured. Independent t-test was performed to determine differences between the groups considering maxillary posterior discrepancy. Principal component analysis and MANCOVA test were also used. Results: No statistically significant differences were found comparing the molar vertical position according to maxillary posterior discrepancy for the SOB Class I group or the group with adequate overbite. Significant differences were found in SOB Class II and Class III groups. In addition, an increased molar vertical position was found in the group without posterior discrepancy. Limitations: Some variables closely related with the individual's intrinsic craniofacial development that could influence the evaluated vertical measurements were not considered. Conclusions and implications: Overall maxillary posterior discrepancy does not appear to have a clear impact on upper molar vertical position or facial vertical dimensions. Only the SOB Class III group without posterior discrepancy had a significant increased upper molar vertical position. © 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjv067es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv067
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Orthodonticses_ES
dc.subjectDentistryes_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttp://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14es_ES
dc.titleInfluence of maxillary posterior discrepancy on upper molar vertical position and facial vertical dimensions in subjects with or without skeletal open bitees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
252. Influence of maxillary posterior dentoalveolar discrepancy on angulation of maxillary molars in individuals with skeletal open bite.PDF
Tamaño:
661.62 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículo