Examinando por Autor "Albites, U."
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Acceso Abierto Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the child perceptions questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14) for the peruvian spanish language(2013) Abanto, J.; Albites, U.; Bönecker, M.; Martins-Paiva, S.; Castillo, J.-L.; Aguilar-Gálvez, D.Objectives: Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) instruments, such as the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14), are broadly used in oral health surveys around the world. However, there is a lack of these instruments in Spanish language limiting the comparison of OHRQoL outcomes among countries, cultures and ethnic groups. The aim of the present study was to cross-culturally adapt the CPQ11-14 to the Peruvian Spanish language and assess its reliability and validity. Material and Methods: To test the translation and cross-cultural adaptation, 60 children aged 11-to-14-years answered the CPQ11-14 in two pilot tests. After that, the questionnaire was tested on 200 children of the same age, who were clinically examined for dental caries. The internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient while repeat administration of the CPQ11-14 on the same 200 children facilitated the test-retest reliability via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct and discriminant validity were based on associations of the CPQ11-14 with global ratings of oral health and clinical groups respectively. Results: The mean (standard deviation) CPQ11-14 score was 20.18(13.07). Internal consistency was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81. Test-retest reliability revealed excellent reproducibility (ICC= 0.92). Construct validity was confirmed demonstrating statistically significant associations between total CPQ11-14 score and global ratings of oral health (p=0.035) and overall well-being (p<0.001). The measure was also able to discriminate between children with dental caries experience and those without (mean scores: 26.32 and 12.96 respectively; p<0.001). Conclusions: The Spanish CPQ11-14 has satisfactory psychometric properties and is applicable to children in Peru. © Medicina Oral S. L.Ítem Acceso Abierto Family Impact Scale (FIS): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties for the Peruvian spanish language [Escala de Impacto Familiar (FIS): adaptación transcultural y propiedades psicométricas al idioma español de Perú](2015) Abanto, J.; Albites, U.; Bönecker, M.; Paiva S.M.; Castillo J.L.; Aguilar-Gálvez, D.The lack of a Family Impact Scale (FIS) in Spanish language limits its use as an indicator in Spanish-speaking countries and precludes comparisons with data from other cultural and ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was therefore to adapt the FIS cross-culturally to the Peruvian Spanish language and assess its reliability and validity. In order to translate and adapt the FIS cross-culturally, it was answered by 60 parents in two pilot tests, after which it was tested on 200 parents of children aged 11 to 14 years who were clinically examined for dental caries experience and malocclusions. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient while repeat administration of the FIS on the same 200 parents enabled the test-retest reliability to be assessed via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct and discriminant validity were based on associations of the FIS with global ratings of oral health and clinical groups, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) FIS total score was 5.20 (5.86). Internal consistency was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha 0.84. Test-retest reliability revealed excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.96). Construct validity was good, demonstrating statistically significant associations between total FIS score and global ratings of oral health (p=0.007) and overall wellbeing (p=0.002), as well as for the subscale scores (p<0.05) with exception of the financial burden subscale. The FIS was also able to discriminate between children with and without dental caries experience and malocclusions (p<0.05). Satisfactory psychometric results for the Peruvian Spanish FIS confirm it as a reliable, valid instrument for assessing the impact on the family caused by children's oral conditions. Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica.La falta de la Escala de Impacto Familiar (FIS) en el idioma español limita su uso como indicador en países hispanohablantes, así como impide las comparaciones con diferentes grupos culturales y étnicos. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar transculturalmente el FIS al idioma español de Perú y evaluar su validad y confiabilidad. Para traducir y adaptar transculturalmente el FIS, 60 padres respondieron al instrumento en dos pruebas piloto. Posteriormente, el FIS fue probado en 200 padres de niños de 11 a 14 años de edad, quienes fueron clínicamente evaluados para la experiencia de caries dental y maloclusiones. La consistencia interna fue evaluada por el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, mientras que la re-aplicación del FIS en los mismos 200 padres permitió la evaluación de la confiabilidad testretest por medio del coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI). La validez de constructo y discriminante se basaron en las asociaciones del FIS con las puntuaciones globales de salud bucal y grupos clínicos, respectivamente. La media (desviación estándar) de la puntuación total del FIS fue 5,20 (5,86). La consistencia interna fue confirmada por el alfa de Cronbach de 0,84. La confiabilidad test-retest reveló una excelente reproducibilidad (CCI=0,96). La validez de constructo fue buena, demostrando una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre la puntuación total del FIS y las puntuaciones globales de salud bucal (p=0,007), bienestar (p=0,002), así como para las puntuaciones de las sub-escalas (p<0,05), con excepción de la sub-escala de carga financiera. El FIS fue capaz de discriminar niños con y sin caries dental y maloclusiones (p<0,05). Los resultados psicométricos satisfactorios de la versión peruana del FIS confirman que es un instrumento válido y confiable para evaluar el impacto en la familia causado por las condiciones bucales de los niños.